by stevemac » 14 May 2009, 11:25
Good question .... I guess it's an area we've not fully or properly explained. It's not a matter of advantage or superiority - it's just a tonal difference which then becomes a matter of perception, playing style and preference.
When we first developed the Gold series models we intentionally aimed for a guitar with a noticibly different tone from the guitars we were already making. This resulted in a bracing style we describe as 'AXX' (referring to how the pattern looks) - visitors to the factory will be in the know!
When the Legacy models were refined, we developed the bracing style on these guitars to what we now call the 'AXE' (which also refers to how the pattern looks, although with a bit more artistic license!).
In guitar design terms, this is part of the evolution of the instrument and it's worth acknowledging the work of our luthiers, in particular Ernie McMillen and Sam Irwin, in developing the AXX bracing style. Essentially, the AXX is stiffer which produces a slightly more compressed tone than the typical Legacy guitar. So it's well suited to flatpicking and strumming. We sometimes describe the tone as being more akin to an American built guitar. And, not surprisingly, we use a variation of the AXX bracing on the Avalon dreadnought and small body Americana guitars.
We've not got round to the R&D on an AXX for the jumbo yet ... so much to do, so little time! However, bracing development work is on-going and for every new model we create, the issue of bracing style is foremost as it is one of the critical influences on how the guitar will respond.
Please start a new thread for any follow ups on this topic!